Written by Josh Jackman Published on 2 January 2020 ✔ Henry VIII’s lifetime carbon footprint was 134 million metric tons of CO2e✔ In contrast, your annual carbon footprint is typically just 10 metric tons✔ 90% of Tudors had no carbon footprintHenry VIII: the one with six wives, 38 years on the throne, a 54-inch waist – and a gigantic carbon footprint of 133,811,287 metric tons of CO2e.Henry VIII's lifetime carbon footprint vs yoursYep, that tiny orange dot is youYou might think, understandably, that living in the Tudor period means the king’s emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases – which creates your carbon footprint – were limited.(To clarify, a carbon footprint doesn’t just include the CO2 you’re responsible for. All of your greenhouse gas emissions count towards the overall number, which is measured in metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.) Did You Know? Methane doesn’t get mentioned as much as CO2 in the climate change discussion, but the BBC has said “it produces 21 times as much warming as CO2.”After all, almost all our modern pitfalls didn’t exist: the widespread use of coal as a fuel was still decades away, fluorinated gases weren’t being used, and nitrous oxide production was limited.Plus, around 90% of England and Wales’ 2.35 million residents lived in sustainable, biodegradable farming communities, and therefore had no discernible carbon footprint.But of course, Henry VIII was no peasant, and sustainable farming was very much not his jam. His court consumed 8,200 sheep, 2,330 deer, 1,870 pigs, 1,240 oxen, 760 calves, and 53 wild boar – every year.He destroyed forests in pursuit of a bigger navy, passed a law which led to the deaths of millions of birds and mammals, and ordered wars and executions that killed more than 100,000 people.We’re going to find out the equivalent metric tons of CO2 (CO2e) this larger-than-life king was responsible for. That means we’ll multiply non-CO2 gases by their global-warming potential (GWP), when compared with CO2.What’s on this page? 01 Food and drink 02 Wood 03 Children 04 Human deaths 05 Animal deaths 06 Henry VIII's Carbon Footprint Food and drink133.8 million metric tons of CO2eHenry VIII notoriously enjoyed his food – and though the king probably never threw bare bones over his shoulder as the Tudor stereotype suggests, he certainly indulged himself to excess.Henry consumed 5,000 calories per day, mostly through meat and other rich foods which denoted his status – and probably ended up giving him gout and diabetes.This would’ve been bad enough, but he was also responsible for the eating habits of his 1,200 staff. If he didn’t employ them, financial necessities would have steered them away from an expensive, heavy diet of meat.The annual meat sent to Henry’s court included:8,200 sheep2,330 deer1,870 pigs1,240 oxen760 calves53 wild boarMethane emissions in Henry's court, by animalThese animals, which were reared for consumption by Henry VIII's court, produced 103.6 million metric tons of methane each year, for 38 years. If the courtiers hadn’t been living in the palace, they would have been responsible for an average of just 792 metric tons.If everyone in the UK today was equally responsible for methane emissions, then the royal court alone created as much methane as 156.9 million people in the UK are responsible for now – more than twice the country’s current population.Henry VIII courtier vs a present-day personSee the yellow circle? To the right of the enormous blue blob? That’s you. Feel better about your emissions now?Henry’s actual methane number is probably even higher, considering he also ordered unknown annual numbers of teal, cygnets, seagulls, shoveler ducks, quail, pheasants, and chickens. Did You Know? Henry VIII had a 12 foot-tall wine fountain at Hampton Court.Plus, he held countless special banquets, as he did in France, at The Field of the Cloth of Gold.This June 1520 summit saw Henry's entourage bring 2,200 sheep (which produce 17.6 metric tons of methane per year), 29,518 fish – and a dolphin – as well as 98,050 eggs, all for consumption.In 1526, a fast meal for him and Catherine of Aragon included “soup, herring, cod, lampreys, pike, salmon, whiting, haddock, plaice, bream, porpoise, seal, carp, trout, crabs, lobsters, custard, tart, fritters and fruit” – for their first course. Wood chopped down and burned11,286.8 metric tons of CO2eKnown as “The Father of the Royal Navy”, Henry invested heavily in England’s marine forces, taking the country’s naval fleet from a handful of ships to more than 50.These ships were each made from around 2,000 trees, making a grand total of 100,000 trees which Henry had cut down for his navy.This was deforestation, which is the second-largest human source of CO2 emissions, after fossil fuel usage.In Henry’s case, it would’ve led to 4,082 metric tons of CO2 entering the atmosphere. Many of these ships were also burned during the king’s numerous wars, resulting in even more CO2 being released. Did You Know? 11% of our current global carbon footprint is down to CO2 emissions from forestry.However, Henry’s relationship with trees wasn’t all bad. In 1543, he passed the Act for the Preservation of Woods, preventing shipbuilders from felling too many young oak trees.466 years later, Prince Charles called it “the very first piece of green legislation in this country” – but that seems high praise for a king concerned with protecting his military and his firewood.Henry was certainly on to something though, as his reign was followed by a firewood supply crisis lasting until the end of the 1600s. This period was marked by the start of the rise of coal – a disastrous part of human history that is largely why we’re facing such catastrophic climate change today.Henry's navy in actionHenry’s gluttony raises its head in this section as well. He ordered 300 casks of wine and 600,000 gallons of beer per person, per year (that’s 11 pints of beer per person, per day). The production of all this alcohol required wood to be burned and turned into barrels.Around 4,646 trees would have been required every year, leading to emissions across Henry’s reign of 7,204.8 metric tons of CO2. Children270,055,506 metric tons of CO2eHenry had four children who he acknowledged as his own, and who survived beyond the first two months of life.These were Queen Mary I, Queen Elizabeth I, King Edward VI, and the only illegitimate child recognised by Henry, Duke Henry Fitzroy.Let’s excuse the carbon footprints of Edward and Henry junior, as they died before adulthood, at ages 15 and 17 respectively. Did You Know? Duke Henry Fitzroy’s surname was given to him by Henry VIII and literally means “son of the king.”Mary and Elizabeth, however, lived to 42 and 69 respectively – a combined 111 years to create carbon footprints.Though no doubt negatively affected by their father’s overt wish for a male heir, his daughters nevertheless enjoyed all the benefits of royalty.If we assume they had similar carbon footprints to their father while ruling England, then 111 more years of emissions are on Henry’s head.The king had an annual carbon footprint of 2,432,932.49 metric tons of CO2e. If you multiply that by 111, you end up with the Queens’ joint lifetime footprint, which was 270,055,506 metric tons of CO2e. Did You Know? A 2017 study found having one fewer child was the most effective pro-climate action you can take nowadays – saving up to 118 metric tons of CO2 per year.Henry chose to have these children, and – just like their father – they had an outsized impact on the climate, as members of the most privileged and exclusive part of society.We’re going to excuse Henry from responsibility over the carbon footprints of his grandchildren and other descendants, as he didn’t make a conscious choice to bring them into existence.Now let’s move onto the natural cost of his actions – or to put it less forgivingly, the immense number of deaths he caused. The loss of these human and animal lives didn’t increase the size of his carbon footprint, but they were still clearly anti-climate actions.Because in the end, what’s the point in protecting the climate if you’re going to destroy the life which it sustains? Wars and executions112,102 deathsHenry VIII wanted England to be an empire, as shown when he broke with the Pope, dissolved the monasteries, and got Parliament to declare that England was an empire, with him as its Supreme Head.His military efforts led him to wars in Scotland, France, and modern-day Italy. This resulted in the deaths of at least 39,702 soldiers. The Battle of Flodden alone killed 11,500.The king was also notorious for executing his rivals and other aristocrats who displeased him, killing off around 350 people in this way. Did You Know? Life expectancy at the time was 35 – but if you were an aristocrat and survived to 21, you’d typically live until 71.However, his execution death count was actually much higher. Laws under Henry handed down capital punishment for every crime, from murder and treason down to heresy, theft, begging, poaching, debt, fraud, and adultery.There were as many as 72,000 executions during Henry’s time in power, meaning that in total, the king was responsible for the deaths of more than 112,000 people.Humans dying doesn’t hurt the climate – rather, in a horrible way, they stop people creating larger carbon footprints – but 90% of people in England, Wales, and the countries Henry’s armies fought had a practically non-existent carbon footprint.So why are they worth noting? Because we’re trying to stop climate change and save the Earth for a reason – and the reason is you. Or more specifically, all life on the planet, including humans. And you’re a human!Henry VIII also oversaw numerous fiery razings of foreign lands. During the Italian War of 1521–26, English soldiers burned their way through the French countryside, and the aptly named Burning of Edinburgh in 1544 saw Henry’s army set at least 36 villages on fire.This was absolutely Henry’s intention, as he told the Earl of Hertford to leave no structure untouched by his path of destruction. “Put all to fire and sword, burn Edinburgh town, so razed and defaced when you have sacked and gotten what ye can of it, as there may remain forever a perpetual memory of the vengeance of God”.– Henry VIIIBurning the buildings probably would have produced minimal CO2 emissions from the inhabitants’ belongings – as well as the buildings’ thatched roofs and wooden frames – but the human cost was high, with around 400 people murdered.In what would be classed as a war crime in present day England, Henry VIII told the Earl that his forces should kill all who they saw in horrific fashion. “Burn and subvert it and all the rest, putting man, woman, and child to fire and sword without exception.”– Henry VIII AnimalsMillions of deathsThe Preservation of Grain Act, passed by Henry in 1532, was disastrous for the animal population of England and Wales.The sheer scale of creatures killed and the accompanying damage to ecosystems was even greater than the human cost noted above, with millions of birds and mammals murdered as a direct result of the law.Poor harvests required a scapegoat, and Henry found a great deal of them. He put together a list of “vermin” he blamed for disease and stealing food, including the wild cat, pine marten, hedgehog, chough, woodpecker, shag, kingfisher, badger, kite, raven, and polecat.Each creature had a bounty on their head, ranging from a penny for the head of a raven to 12 pence for a fox. Considering the average wage was four pence per day at this time, these rewards were high. Did You Know? Henry VIII owned at least 60 homes, and travelled between them with an entourage of roughly 1,500 people.And if Henry’s subjects needed any more motivation, there were fines for any community that didn’t murder a sufficient number of listed animals.Former RSPB director Roger Lovegrove told The Guardian that the effects can still be felt today, saying: “Wildlife and ecology suffered – and continues to suffer – to an extreme extent from the systematic medieval attempts to eradicate certain species.”Hedgehogs were falsely accused of sucking milk from sleeping cows under cover of night. Perhaps because of this myth, they suffered more than most, with half a million slaughtered over the next century. The king’s daughter, Queen Elizabeth I, was encouraged to strengthen the law, and she included other animals like otters.Henry also personally killed more than his share. During the 27 years he hunted while king – until he was severely injured falling off his horse – Henry laid waste to wild animals in grounds, parks, and forests across the country. Henry VIII's Carbon Footprint 404,000,000 metric tons of CO2eHenry VIII lived centuries before man-made climate change started to affect the Earth, but his era saw atmospheric CO2 concentration levels reach their highest point before the Industrial Revolution.His gigantic carbon footprint of 134 million metric tons of CO2e – which, when added to that of his daughters Mary and Elizabeth, adds up to 404 million metric tons of CO2e – played a disproportionate part in that rise.And let’s not forget that England is still recovering from the king’s vicious, pointless, arbitrary war on animals.Henry had no idea about climate change – and that’s the only excuse for a man whose orders created death, destruction, and depravity. Written by: Josh Jackman Lead Writer Josh has written about eco-friendly home improvements and climate change for the past four years. His work has been displayed on the front page of the Financial Times, he's been interviewed by BBC One's Rip-Off Britain, and he regularly features in The Telegraph and on BBC Radio.